PDF NEW [A Crime of Self Defense Bernhard Goetz and the Law on Trial]


  • Paperback
  • 272
  • A Crime of Self Defense Bernhard Goetz and the Law on Trial
  • George P. Fletcher
  • English
  • 26 June 2018
  • 9780226253343

George P. Fletcher ´ 9 SUMMARY

SUMMARY A Crime of Self Defense Bernhard Goetz and the Law on Trial 109 George P. Fletcher ´ 9 SUMMARY SUMMARY ¸ E-book, or Kindle E-pub ´ George P. Fletcher Ot four black youths on a New York subway train when one of them asked for five dollars Goe. I read this book during my first semester in US to get knowledge about self defense an action at that time I thought I might resort to sooner or later in US However it turned out to be than just a case Actually it s about the US judicial system the long standing racial discrimination issue and a lots of

SUMMARY ¸ E-book, or Kindle E-pub ´ George P. Fletcher

A Crime of Self Defense Bernhard Goetz and the Law on Trial

SUMMARY A Crime of Self Defense Bernhard Goetz and the Law on Trial 109 George P. Fletcher ´ 9 SUMMARY SUMMARY ¸ E-book, or Kindle E-pub ´ George P. Fletcher Tz claimed to have fired in self defense out of fear that the young men were about to rob h. This was an interesting book about the trial of Goetz for shooting the four hoodlums on the subway in New York It goes through the entire story of the shooting Goetz s turning himself in in NH the indictments and the full trial It was interesting hearing about the choosing of the jurors as well as the entire trial I was a little surprised that they also talked about what happened during the jury deliberations as I thought from my own service on a jury that no one talked about that in detail afterwards especially with the names of the other jurors

CHARACTERS A Crime of Self Defense Bernhard Goetz and the Law on Trial

SUMMARY A Crime of Self Defense Bernhard Goetz and the Law on Trial 109 George P. Fletcher ´ 9 SUMMARY SUMMARY ¸ E-book, or Kindle E-pub ´ George P. Fletcher The popular press dubbed him the subway vigilante Bernhard Goetz who on December 22 1984 sh. This book is about than just the trial of Bernhard Goetz Within this book you will find the main contending theories of self defense as they are expressed in various forms throughout the legal landscape The important part of reading this book is being able to highlight the four main theories of self defense and the four elements that attach to those theories There are four conflicting theories of self defense Within these four conflicting theories there is also four weighting elements that provide the general framework for the law of self defense The four elements are intention proportionality necessity and imminence Fletcher 26 The four elements make up the strength and weaknesses of each theory of self defense The first theory is that self defense is a form of privately inflicted punishment that is just In this model of self defense the elemental reuirements that a threat is imminent and that the reaction was necessary are extremely loose In addition the proportionality of defense is uestionable As an example the crime of rape can be defended by killing the aggressor However the crime of rape is not punishable by death under the law This undermines the proportionality reuirement of the theory The benefit under this model is that the defender gets to dish out justice The second model of self defense treats it as an excuse based on the defendant s uncontrollable reaction to fear This defense is sometimes called the cornered animal defense This theory has its roots in English law from the 13th to the 16th century when it was called se defendendo Fletcher 30 Under this theory of self defense the killing of another person is still homicide but it is justifiable in that if we were caught in the same circumstances we would have acted the same way Fletcher 30 This theory relies heavily on the issues of necessity and imminence but loosens the reuirement of proportionality Under this defense before using violence it is a reuirement that there are no other options but violence The third model of self defense holds it as an individualist justification Under this theory an individual has a right to stand their ground against an aggressor that is in the wrong This model changes the excusable theory held in se defendendo to a justifiable criteria Under the most extreme versions of this model of self defense the proportionality reuirement is dropped completely in favor of the belief that any encroachment on an individual reuires vindication This theory also relaxes the reuirements of necessity and imminence It is this third model of self defense the Goetz lawyer Slotnick invoked in the defenses opening statement when he stated No one can ever take away your inalienable right to protect your property or your life or your family No one can walk up to me and say give me that watch give me your ring give me five dollars And if they do heaven help them if I m armed because I know what the law allows Slotnick td in Fletcher 33 The fourth theory of self defense much like the third one is also a justification theory but this one is the social version Under the extreme version of the individualist theory of self defense proportionality is completely rejected Under the social theory of self defense the proportionality element is given the most weight Fletcher 33 Under this theory humans are treated as interdependent cooperating members of society that seek mutual advantage as such the defender must consider the aggressor as a human being and not merely as an intrusive force Fletcher 34 In the trial of Bernhard Goetz his attorney Barry Slotnick relied on an interweaving of all the theories except for the social justification During the trial if the focus turned towards Goetz fear of the Troy Canty Barry Allen James Ramseur and Darrel Cabey then Slotnick would rely on the second model of self defense treating Goetz response as an excuse Fletcher 36 If the focus turned toward emphasizing Goetz right not to surrender his property money then the arguments would turn toward the individualist theory of self defense Fletcher 36 Perhaps the most relied upon theory of self defense in the Goetz trial was the first theory This relied heavily on the oft repeated phrase by Slotnick and witnesses in that they got what they deserved By using this phrase often and repeatedly the defense made an appeal to imminence and necessity that they wanted the jury to believe Goetz acted within By placing the emphasis on Goetz fears the defense was able to appeal to the emotions of the jury Fletcher 37 Given the difficulties found in the various theories I would suggest a proportionality justification based on forced conseuences This justification on forced conseuences would hold that both the defender and the aggressor have an absolute unconditional and unualified right not to be killed Using parts of all four theories and combining them eually with the elements of intention proportionality necessity and imminence this forced justification would help unravel responses to distinct situation I would treat each case as separately and distinct from previous cases and not rely on precedence I strongly believe that each act of self defense is distinct and cannot be eually compared to one another However the importance of the elements of self defense should each be considered when determining the right or wrong of the action Garudayana Vol 4 popular Beyond the Veil VeilDixon Security #2 press dubbed him the subway vigilante Bernhard Goetz who on December 22 1984 sh. This book is about than just the trial of Bernhard Goetz Within this book you will find the main contending theories of self defense as they are expressed in various forms throughout the legal landscape The important The Weeping Undergraduate part of reading this book is being able to highlight the four main theories of self defense and the four elements that attach to those theories There are four conflicting theories of self defense Within these four conflicting theories there is also four weighting elements that Villa Incognito provide the general framework for the law of self defense The four elements are intention El Lazarillo De Tormes (Spanish Edition) proportionality necessity and imminence Fletcher 26 The four elements make up the strength and weaknesses of each theory of self defense The first theory is that self defense is a form of Konkurz na milence privately inflicted The Crooked Computer punishment that is just In this model of self defense the elemental reuirements that a threat is imminent and that the reaction was necessary are extremely loose In addition the Kissing Midnight proportionality of defense is uestionable As an example the crime of rape can be defended by killing the aggressor However the crime of rape is not Histoire de la violence punishable by death under the law This undermines the درد عشق زلیخا پژوهشی در قصه یوسف proportionality reuirement of the theory The benefit under this model is that the defender gets to dish out justice The second model of self defense treats it as an excuse based on the defendant s uncontrollable reaction to fear This defense is sometimes called the cornered animal defense This theory has its roots in English law from the 13th to the 16th century when it was called se defendendo Fletcher 30 Under this theory of self defense the killing of another The Medallions Curse person is still homicide but it is justifiable in that if we were caught in the same circumstances we would have acted the same way Fletcher 30 This theory relies heavily on the issues of necessity and imminence but loosens the reuirement of Maxims of Kabir proportionality Under this defense before using violence it is a reuirement that there are no other options but violence The third model of self defense holds it as an individualist justification Under this theory an individual has a right to stand their ground against an aggressor that is in the wrong This model changes the excusable theory held in se defendendo to a justifiable criteria Under the most extreme versions of this model of self defense the Elegant Sewing for Baby projects from Martha's Sewing Room Series 1300 and 1400 proportionality reuirement is dropped completely in favor of the belief that any encroachment on an individual reuires vindication This theory also relaxes the reuirements of necessity and imminence It is this third model of self defense the Goetz lawyer Slotnick invoked in the defenses opening statement when he stated No one can ever take away your inalienable right to The Edge of Worlds protect your A Slaves Life property or your life or your family No one can walk up to me and say give me that watch give me your ring give me five dollars And if they do heaven help them if I m armed because I know what the law allows Slotnick td in Fletcher 33 The fourth theory of self defense much like the third one is also a justification theory but this one is the social version Under the extreme version of the individualist theory of self defense Informe Que Dirige a la Legislatura de Guayana En Su Renuion Ordinaria de 1868 El Presidente del Estado proportionality is completely rejected Under the social theory of self defense the Be Not Afraid proportionality element is given the most weight Fletcher 33 Under this theory humans are treated as interdependent cooperating members of society that seek mutual advantage as such the defender must consider the aggressor as a human being and not merely as an intrusive force Fletcher 34 In the trial of Bernhard Goetz his attorney Barry Slotnick relied on an interweaving of all the theories except for the social justification During the trial if the focus turned towards Goetz fear of the Troy Canty Barry Allen James Ramseur and Darrel Cabey then Slotnick would rely on the second model of self defense treating Goetz response as an excuse Fletcher 36 If the focus turned toward emphasizing Goetz right not to surrender his Exposition of English Law by English Judges (1886-1891) (Classic Reprint) property money then the arguments would turn toward the individualist theory of self defense Fletcher 36 Perhaps the most relied upon theory of self defense in the Goetz trial was the first theory This relied heavily on the oft repeated Blood Money (Bounty Hunter No 2) phrase by Slotnick and witnesses in that they got what they deserved By using this Muskat phrase often and repeatedly the defense made an appeal to imminence and necessity that they wanted the jury to believe Goetz acted within By Hidden Folk placing the emphasis on Goetz fears the defense was able to appeal to the emotions of the jury Fletcher 37 Given the difficulties found in the various theories I would suggest a Drafting of Contractual Letters proportionality justification based on forced conseuences This justification on forced conseuences would hold that both the defender and the aggressor have an absolute unconditional and unualified right not to be killed Using Henri LefebvreA Critical Introduction parts of all four theories and combining them eually with the elements of intention The Eye of the Elephant proportionality necessity and imminence this forced justification would help unravel responses to distinct situation I would treat each case as separately and distinct from Sotto il banco previous cases and not rely on The Fortean Times Paranormal Handbook precedence I strongly believe that each act of self defense is distinct and cannot be eually compared to one another However the importance of the elements of self defense should each be considered when determining the right or wrong of the action


4 thoughts on “PDF NEW [A Crime of Self Defense Bernhard Goetz and the Law on Trial]

  1. says: PDF NEW [A Crime of Self Defense Bernhard Goetz and the Law on Trial] George P. Fletcher ´ 9 SUMMARY

    PDF NEW [A Crime of Self Defense Bernhard Goetz and the Law on Trial] SUMMARY ¸ E-book, or Kindle E-pub ´ George P. Fletcher George P. Fletcher ´ 9 SUMMARY This book is about than just the trial of Bernhard Goetz Within this book you will find the main contending theories of self defense as they are expressed in various forms throughout the legal landscape The important part of reading this book is being able to highlight the four main theories of self defense and the four elements that attach

  2. says: PDF NEW [A Crime of Self Defense Bernhard Goetz and the Law on Trial]

    George P. Fletcher ´ 9 SUMMARY SUMMARY ¸ E-book, or Kindle E-pub ´ George P. Fletcher CHARACTERS A Crime of Self Defense Bernhard Goetz and the Law on Trial I read this book during my first semester in US to get knowledge about self defense an action at that time I thought I might resort to sooner or later in US However it turned out to be than just a case Actually it's about the US judicial system the long standing racial discrimination issue and a lots of

  3. says: CHARACTERS A Crime of Self Defense Bernhard Goetz and the Law on Trial George P. Fletcher ´ 9 SUMMARY PDF NEW [A Crime of Self Defense Bernhard Goetz and the Law on Trial]

    George P. Fletcher ´ 9 SUMMARY SUMMARY ¸ E-book, or Kindle E-pub ´ George P. Fletcher CHARACTERS A Crime of Self Defense Bernhard Goetz and the Law on Trial This was an interesting book about the trial of Goetz for shooting the four hoodlums on the subway in New York It goes through the entire story of the shooting Goetz's turning himself in in NH the indictments and t

  4. says: George P. Fletcher ´ 9 SUMMARY SUMMARY ¸ E-book, or Kindle E-pub ´ George P. Fletcher PDF NEW [A Crime of Self Defense Bernhard Goetz and the Law on Trial]

    PDF NEW [A Crime of Self Defense Bernhard Goetz and the Law on Trial] An infuriating and facinating read about a trial that should have gone another way Berhard Goetz is pathetic and a murderer who's defense lawyers massacred the incompetent prosecuters in his trialGoetz gunned down a few obnoxious black kids on a NY subway and got away with it because his attorneys manages to pain

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *